SayPro Accreditation Feedback: Employee Feedback on Accredited Training Programs for Evaluation Purposes

Purpose:

The SayPro Accreditation Feedback form allows employees to provide valuable input regarding their experiences with accredited training programs. This feedback is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of the training, ensuring that it meets the requirements set by the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO), and identifying areas for improvement. By gathering structured feedback from employees, training providers can maintain high standards of training delivery and ensure continuous improvement in alignment with QCTO guidelines.

Key Components of the Feedback Form:

1. Employee Information (Confidential):
   • Name: Optional (if anonymity is preferred).
   • Employee ID: For tracking purposes (optional).
   • Department/Role: Helps in understanding which sector or role the feedback pertains to.
   • Date of Training: Date(s) when the training was conducted.
2. Training Program Information:
   • Program Title: The name of the accredited training program.
   • Trainer/Facilitator Name: The trainer or facilitator who conducted the program.
   • Training Location: Whether the training was in-person or online and the specific venue or platform used.
   • Accreditation Details: The QCTO accreditation number and any relevant unit standards covered.
3. Feedback on Training Content:
   • Relevance of Content: How relevant did you find the training material to your current role or career development? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Clarity of Training Material: Were the materials clear and easy to understand? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Depth of Knowledge Covered: Was the material covered in sufficient depth to meet your learning needs? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
4. Feedback on Delivery Methods:
   • Trainer’s Knowledge and Expertise: Did the trainer demonstrate a clear understanding of the material? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Training Delivery Style: How effective were the methods used by the trainer? Were they engaging, interactive, and relevant? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Use of Technology/Resources: Was the technology used (e.g., PowerPoint, online platform) appropriate and helpful? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
5. Feedback on Practical Aspects:
   • Hands-On Activities/Practical Sessions: Were there enough practical activities or exercises to reinforce learning? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Assessments/Exams: Were the assessments fair and relevant to the content taught? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Interaction and Participation: Were you able to interact with the trainer and other participants effectively? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
6. Overall Experience:
   • Overall Satisfaction with the Training Program: How satisfied are you with the training you received? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Achievement of Learning Outcomes: Did the training meet your expectations and help you achieve your learning goals? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
   • Application of Knowledge to Work: How likely are you to apply the knowledge and skills gained from the training to your work? (Rate on a scale of 1-5)
     • Comments: (Optional)
7. Suggestions for Improvement:
   • What aspects of the training program could be improved? (Open-ended)
   • Any additional resources or support you would have liked to receive during the training? (Open-ended)
   • How can the trainer’s delivery methods be enhanced to improve engagement or understanding? (Open-ended)
8. Future Training Interests:
   • Would you recommend this training program to your colleagues? (Yes/No/Maybe)
   • What other training topics would you like to see offered in the future? (Open-ended)

Example of the Accreditation Feedback Form Layout:

Employee Name	Employee ID	Department	Date of Training
John Doe	123456	Technical	12-Mar-2025

---

Training Program Feedback:

Program Title	Trainer Name	Training Location
Engineering NQF Level 4	Sarah Smith	Online (Zoom)

---

1. Relevance of Content:
How relevant was the content to your current role?
(1 = Not relevant, 5 = Highly relevant)
Rating: 4
Comments: The content was relevant, but a bit more focus on real-world applications would have been helpful.

---

2. Trainer’s Knowledge:
Did the trainer demonstrate clear knowledge of the subject?
Rating: 5
Comments: The trainer was very knowledgeable and answered all questions effectively.

---

3. Hands-On Activities:
Were there enough practical activities or exercises to reinforce learning?
Rating: 3
Comments: More hands-on exercises could be useful to practice the skills being taught.

---

4. Overall Satisfaction:
How satisfied were you with the training overall?
Rating: 4
Comments: Overall, the training met my expectations, but there is room for improvement in interactive exercises.

---

5. Suggestions for Improvement:
What could be improved in the program?
Comments: More case studies and real-life examples would make the training even more valuable.

---

Employee Signature: ______________________
Date: _________

---

Purpose of the Feedback Form:

• Quality Assurance: The feedback helps training providers assess how well their programs meet QCTO standards and identify areas for improvement.
• Employee Engagement: Provides a platform for employees to voice their experiences, ensuring they are involved in the continuous improvement process.
• Program Improvement: Enables trainers and training organizations to make adjustments to the content, delivery, and resources to better meet the needs of future participants.
• Accreditation Maintenance: Helps the training organization gather necessary information to maintain and renew their QCTO accreditation by demonstrating their commitment to feedback and quality improvement.