SayPro Evaluation and Scoring Template.

SayPro Monthly January SCDR-3 Design Challenges

(Organized by SayPro Development Competitions Office under SayPro Development Royalty SCDR)

---

📌 Instructions for Judges & Evaluators

🔹 This evaluation template is designed to ensure a fair and standardized assessment of all project submissions.
🔹 Each project will be scored based on specific criteria, with a maximum possible score of 100 points.
🔹 Evaluators should provide constructive feedback for each criterion to help participants improve.
🔹 Projects that score above 80% will be considered for awards and further development opportunities.
🔹 The final decision will be based on an average of all judges’ scores.

📆 Evaluation Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]
📩 For inquiries, contact: [SayPro Support Email]

---

📜 SayPro Evaluation and Scoring Template

1. Judge’s Information

📌 Judge’s Name: __________________________
📌 Affiliation/Organization: __________________________
📌 Email: __________________________
📌 Date of Evaluation: //_________

---

2. Participant/Team Information

📌 Project Title: __________________________
📌 Team/Individual Name: __________________________
📌 Category: (Select One)
☐ AI & Automation
☐ Healthcare Innovations
☐ Smart Cities & Infrastructure
☐ Renewable Energy
☐ Other: _____________________

📌 Team Leader’s Name (If Applicable): __________________________

---

3. Evaluation Criteria & Scoring

(Each criterion is rated from 1 to 10, where 1 = Poor and 10 = Excellent)

Criteria	Description	Score (1-10)
Problem Identification	Clearly defines the problem and its significance	____/10
Innovation & Creativity	Uniqueness of the solution and its innovative approach	____/10
Technical Feasibility	Practicality and technical soundness of the project	____/10
Implementation Plan	Well-structured execution plan and realistic timeline	____/10
Impact & Sustainability	Long-term benefits and real-world application	____/10
Scalability & Market Potential	Potential for expansion and commercialization	____/10
Design & Functionality	Aesthetic, user-friendliness, and practical usability	____/10
Presentation & Communication	Clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of the proposal	____/10
Budget & Resource Management	Effective cost planning and resource allocation	____/10
Overall Impression	General impression of the project’s value and viability	____/10

📌 Total Score: ____/100

---

4. Detailed Feedback & Comments

📌 Strengths of the Project:
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

📌 Areas for Improvement:
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

📌 Suggestions for Further Development:
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________

---

5. Final Recommendation

☑ Recommend for Award Consideration
☑ Recommend for Further Development & Mentorship
☑ Needs Significant Improvement

✍️ Judge’s Signature: __________________________
📆 Date: //_________

---

📊 Summary of SayPro Evaluation and Scoring Template

Section	Purpose
Judge’s Information	Records evaluator details for accountability
Participant Information	Identifies the project being evaluated
Evaluation Criteria	Standardized scoring based on project merits
Detailed Feedback	Provides constructive critique and suggestions
Final Recommendation	Determines project eligibility for awards or further development

---

📢 Conclusion

This SayPro Evaluation and Scoring Template ensures a transparent, objective, and structured assessment process for the SayPro Monthly January SCDR-3 Design Challenges.

Would you like any modifications based on specific judging requirements? 🚀