SayPro Feedback Form for Theatre Performances.

Event: SayPro Monthly Theatre Performances
Event Date: January 2025
Organized by: SayPro Competitions Office
Purpose: To provide judges with a structured template for offering detailed and constructive feedback on each performance, which will be shared with the participating theatre companies after the event. This feedback is vital for helping performers, directors, and technical teams understand their strengths and areas for improvement.

---

Overview

The SayPro Feedback Form serves as a detailed guide for judges to offer insightful, objective, and actionable feedback on theatre performances. This form covers a range of key elements that judges should consider when evaluating the performances, such as acting, directing, script quality, stagecraft, and overall production. The feedback provided will help participants understand their performance’s strengths and identify areas for growth, contributing to their development as theatre practitioners.

The feedback will be collected after the event and distributed to each theatre company so they can review it and incorporate the feedback into future productions.

---

Key Sections of the Feedback Form

1. General Performance Overview

This section allows judges to provide an overall impression of the performance before delving into specifics.

• Overall Impression:
  • Describe your general feelings about the production. How did it impact you as an audience member?
  • Was the performance engaging from start to finish?
• What Worked Well:
  • Highlight the standout aspects of the performance, such as powerful moments, strong performances, effective use of space, or creative elements.
  • Were there specific moments in the production that stood out as particularly effective or memorable?
• Areas for Improvement:
  • Offer constructive criticism that will help the theatre company improve. What areas do you feel need the most attention?
  • Were there particular elements that seemed weak, distracting, or underdeveloped?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Needs Significant Improvement, 5 = Outstanding)

---

2. Acting

In this section, judges assess the quality of the acting and how well the actors brought their characters to life.

• Character Portrayal:
  • Were the actors able to embody their characters convincingly? Were they believable in their roles?
  • Did the actors display an understanding of their character’s motivations and emotions?
• Emotional Range:
  • How well did the actors convey a range of emotions? Were they able to show vulnerability, intensity, and complexity?
  • Did the actors’ performances emotionally resonate with the audience?
• Chemistry Between Cast Members:
  • Did the actors work well together? Was there a natural, engaging dynamic between them?
  • Was the ensemble cast cohesive, or did certain performances feel disconnected?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor Performance, 5 = Exceptional Performance)

Additional Comments:
Provide specific examples of strong or weak performances, including the delivery of key lines, body language, or vocal projection.

---

3. Directing

This section evaluates the director’s role in managing the overall vision of the production, pacing, and guiding the cast and crew.

• Vision and Concept:
  • Did the director have a clear, compelling vision for the performance? Was this vision effectively communicated through the production?
  • How well did the director handle the themes and concepts of the play?
• Pacing and Timing:
  • Was the pacing of the performance well-maintained, or were there moments that dragged or felt rushed?
  • Did the director create a natural rhythm in the flow of scenes, transitions, and emotional beats?
• Blocking and Staging:
  • Was the movement of the actors on stage purposeful and visually appealing?
  • Did the director make effective use of the stage space, ensuring it was visually engaging and dynamic?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Needs Improvement, 5 = Excellent Direction)

Additional Comments:
Provide feedback on specific directorial decisions that stood out, such as choices regarding scene transitions, character placement, or use of the space.

---

4. Script and Storytelling

This section assesses the script’s quality and its effectiveness in telling the story, keeping the audience engaged, and building emotional impact.

• Script Strength:
  • Was the script clear, coherent, and compelling? Did the dialogue feel natural and serve the story well?
  • Did the script effectively develop the themes and characters throughout the performance?
• Pacing and Structure:
  • Was the pacing of the script appropriate? Were there moments where the plot dragged or felt too fast?
  • How well did the script structure build tension, resolve conflicts, and provide satisfying moments of payoff?
• Relevance and Originality:
  • Was the script original and fresh, or did it feel derivative? Did the story feel timely and relevant to the audience?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor Script, 5 = Excellent Script)

Additional Comments:
Provide specific feedback on the script’s strengths and weaknesses. Were there specific scenes or moments that felt particularly impactful or lacking?

---

5. Stagecraft (Set, Lighting, Sound, and Costumes)

This section evaluates the technical elements of the production, including set design, lighting, sound, and costumes.

• Set Design and Construction:
  • Did the set design fit the production’s theme and mood? Was it functional and visually compelling?
  • Were the set elements integrated well with the overall production?
• Lighting:
  • Was the lighting used effectively to set the tone, create atmosphere, and highlight key moments?
  • Did the lighting enhance the overall storytelling, or were there moments where it detracted from the performance?
• Sound and Music:
  • Was the sound design appropriate, and did it contribute to the atmosphere of the production?
  • Were the sound effects and music used to enhance key moments or emotions in the script?
• Costumes:
  • Were the costumes appropriate for the time period, characters, and setting of the play?
  • Did the costumes effectively support the character development and visual style of the production?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor Execution, 5 = Exceptional Stagecraft)

Additional Comments:
Provide specific feedback on technical elements such as set changes, lighting cues, or costume choices that contributed to or detracted from the performance.

---

6. Overall Production Quality

This final section asks judges to assess how all elements of the production come together to create a cohesive and impactful experience.

• Integration of Elements:
  • Did the acting, directing, script, and technical elements work well together to create a unified production?
  • Did the production feel cohesive and well-balanced, or were there noticeable discrepancies?
• Audience Impact:
  • Did the performance engage the audience emotionally or intellectually?
  • Was the production successful in creating the intended atmosphere or experience for the viewers?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Lacking Cohesion, 5 = Exceptional Integration)

Additional Comments:
Summarize your overall thoughts on the production. Were there standout moments or elements that elevated the performance? Did anything significantly detract from the overall experience?

---

Final Recommendations and Feedback

• Strengths:
  • List the top strengths of the production, highlighting areas that the team excelled in. These might include standout performances, innovative directing, or impactful set design.
• Areas for Improvement:
  • Provide actionable suggestions for improvement, ensuring that your feedback is constructive. This might include advice on pacing, character development, technical improvements, or other areas where the production can be enhanced.

Suggestions for Future Work:

• Based on the performance, offer suggestions that could help the theatre company further refine their craft in future productions.

---

Signature and Date

• Judge’s Name: _________________________
• Date: _______________________________
• Signature: ___________________________

---

Conclusion

The SayPro Feedback Form is a vital tool for providing both constructive and positive feedback to theatre companies following their performances. It encourages judges to be specific in their assessments while giving performers and production teams valuable insights that will help them improve their work. By using this form, SayPro aims to foster growth and development within the theatre community and provide meaningful recognition for excellent performances.