Below is a standardized Corrective Action Plan (CAP) template and process for SayPro, designed to address instances where a Chief’s performance does not meet expectations. This plan provides a clear, fair, and accountable path to improvement, ensuring that leadership remains aligned with SayPro’s strategic and operational goals.
✅ SayPro Chief Performance Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
🔍 Purpose
To provide a structured and transparent process for identifying underperformance by SayPro Chiefs, addressing root causes, and guiding improvement through specific, time-bound actions.
📄 Section 1: General Information
Chief’s Name | |
---|---|
Position | |
Department | |
Review Period | |
Date CAP Initiated | |
Initiated By (CEO/Board/COO) |
🚩 Section 2: Identified Performance Issues
Clearly outline the areas where performance did not meet expectations.
Performance Area | Issue Description | Expected Standard | Observed Result |
---|---|---|---|
Financial Oversight | Missed quarterly budget targets by 25% | Within 5% variance | -25% variance |
Program Delivery | Delayed key deliverables for 3 projects | ≥ 90% on-time delivery | 60% delivery |
Staff Engagement | Low team morale and increased staff turnover | >80% retention, positive feedback | 65% retention |
🛠️ Section 3: Root Cause Analysis
Analyze the possible causes of underperformance.
- Internal (e.g., leadership gaps, communication issues, decision delays):
- Example: Lack of regular departmental reviews
- External (e.g., funding cuts, technology failures, supplier delays):
- Example: Procurement delays due to vendor changes
📈 Section 4: Corrective Action Plan
Specify what actions will be taken, who is responsible, and how success will be measured.
Corrective Action | Responsible Party | Deadline | Success Metric | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Implement monthly financial review with CFO team | CFO | 30 May | Variance reduced to ≤ 5% | In Progress |
Schedule biweekly project status check-ins | COO | 10 May | 90% of projects on schedule | Not Started |
Launch anonymous team engagement survey | CHRO | 15 May | ≥ 80% positive response rate | Planned |
🧭 Section 5: Monitoring & Evaluation
Outline how progress will be tracked and evaluated over time.
Monitoring Method | Frequency | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
KPI tracker updates | Weekly | Strategy Office |
Feedback from team/stakeholders | Monthly | HR Department |
Interim performance reviews | Bi-monthly | CEO or Line Manager |
🧾 Section 6: Consequences for Continued Underperformance
Clearly state what will happen if no measurable improvement occurs by the end of the CAP period.
- Formal written warning and additional oversight
- Reassignment or role restructuring
- Contract review and potential termination
- Recommendation to the Board for action
✅ Section 7: Acknowledgement & Commitment
By signing this document, the Chief agrees to the corrective actions and acknowledges that failure to meet the improvement goals may result in further disciplinary action.
Chief’s Name | Signature __________________ | Date __________ |
---|---|---|
Evaluator (e.g., CEO) | Signature __________________ | Date __________ |
🗂️ Appendices (Optional Attachments)
- Latest performance report
- Feedback documents
- Team survey results
- Financial or program delivery reports
⏳ Suggested CAP Duration
Performance Level | CAP Duration |
---|---|
Moderate Gaps | 30 days |
Significant Gaps | 60–90 days |
Chronic Underperformance | Up to 120 days (with Board review) |
This Corrective Action Plan ensures that SayPro maintains high leadership standards while providing a fair, clear path for Chiefs to improve and succeed.
Would you like this as a downloadable Word document, Google Doc, or fillable PDF template for use in your HR or performance management process?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.