Certainly! Below is a structured guideline for SayPro on how to identify and document discrepancies in data or reports, including the type of error and the potential impact. This process helps maintain transparency, data integrity, and continuous improvement across Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) systems.
โ SayPro Data Discrepancy Identification & Documentation Procedure
๐ Objective:
To systematically identify, classify, and document discrepancies in SayPro datasets and reports, and assess their potential impact on decision-making and reporting accuracy.
๐ Step-by-Step Process
1. Review Source Data vs. Reported Data
- Compare datasets with source documents (e.g., registers, logs, MIS).
- Validate calculations and indicator aggregations.
- Check for missing, duplicated, or altered values.
2. Identify and Record Discrepancies
Use the SayPro Data Discrepancy Log Template (SCLMR-5-DDL) or structure your record as follows:
Discrepancy ID | Data Source | Indicator/Field | Type of Error | Description | Potential Impact | Detected By | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D001 | Training Report Q1 | # of participants trained | Overreporting | Report says 152; source form shows 127 | Inflated performance data, donor misreporting | M&E Officer | 03 Apr 2025 |
D002 | Health Register | # of ANC visits | Missing Data | No entries for March in two facilities | Incomplete coverage data, planning blind spots | QA Analyst | 05 Apr 2025 |
D003 | Attendance Log | School Absences | Wrong Disaggregation | Male/female columns mixed | Gender reporting errors | Data Clerk | 06 Apr 2025 |
3. Classify Type of Discrepancy
Error Type | Description |
---|---|
Overreporting | Reported value exceeds verified value. |
Underreporting | Reported value is lower than the verified value. |
Duplicate Entries | Same data entered more than once. |
Missing Data | Required data fields left blank or not recorded. |
Wrong Disaggregation | Misclassification by gender, age, location, etc. |
Incorrect Calculation | Formula or logic used is wrong. |
Mismatched Dates | Dates in records do not align with actual reporting period. |
Wrong Source Used | Data pulled from non-approved or outdated tools. |
4. Assess Potential Impact
Impact Level | Definition |
---|---|
High | Could significantly distort program performance, lead to donor issues or misallocation. |
Moderate | Affects interpretation of data but not significantly program-wide decisions. |
Low | Minor inconsistency; does not affect outcomes but must still be corrected. |
5. Document Supporting Evidence
- Attach screenshots, scanned forms, or system logs showing the error.
- Label each attachment by Discrepancy ID for traceability.
6. Report and Escalate
- Submit documented discrepancies to the M&E Manager or Audit Lead.
- Include them in the Audit Findings Report (SCLMR-5-AFR).
- Feed into the Corrective Action Plan (SCLMR-5-CAP) for resolution.
๐ ๏ธ Tools & Templates
- SayPro Discrepancy Log Template (SCLMR-5-DDL)
- Audit Findings Report (SCLMR-5-AFR)
- Corrective Action Plan (SCLMR-5-CAP)
- Discrepancy Evidence Folder (digital or physical archive)
Would you like a fillable template in Excel or Word format for logging discrepancies across SayPro projects? I can generate and structure one for direct use.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.