SayPro Identify and document discrepancies in the data or reports, including the type of error and its potential impact.

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button ๐Ÿ‘‡

Certainly! Below is a structured guideline for SayPro on how to identify and document discrepancies in data or reports, including the type of error and the potential impact. This process helps maintain transparency, data integrity, and continuous improvement across Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) systems.


โœ… SayPro Data Discrepancy Identification & Documentation Procedure

๐Ÿ” Objective:

To systematically identify, classify, and document discrepancies in SayPro datasets and reports, and assess their potential impact on decision-making and reporting accuracy.


๐Ÿ“‹ Step-by-Step Process

1. Review Source Data vs. Reported Data

  • Compare datasets with source documents (e.g., registers, logs, MIS).
  • Validate calculations and indicator aggregations.
  • Check for missing, duplicated, or altered values.

2. Identify and Record Discrepancies

Use the SayPro Data Discrepancy Log Template (SCLMR-5-DDL) or structure your record as follows:

Discrepancy IDData SourceIndicator/FieldType of ErrorDescriptionPotential ImpactDetected ByDate
D001Training Report Q1# of participants trainedOverreportingReport says 152; source form shows 127Inflated performance data, donor misreportingM&E Officer03 Apr 2025
D002Health Register# of ANC visitsMissing DataNo entries for March in two facilitiesIncomplete coverage data, planning blind spotsQA Analyst05 Apr 2025
D003Attendance LogSchool AbsencesWrong DisaggregationMale/female columns mixedGender reporting errorsData Clerk06 Apr 2025

3. Classify Type of Discrepancy

Error TypeDescription
OverreportingReported value exceeds verified value.
UnderreportingReported value is lower than the verified value.
Duplicate EntriesSame data entered more than once.
Missing DataRequired data fields left blank or not recorded.
Wrong DisaggregationMisclassification by gender, age, location, etc.
Incorrect CalculationFormula or logic used is wrong.
Mismatched DatesDates in records do not align with actual reporting period.
Wrong Source UsedData pulled from non-approved or outdated tools.

4. Assess Potential Impact

Impact LevelDefinition
HighCould significantly distort program performance, lead to donor issues or misallocation.
ModerateAffects interpretation of data but not significantly program-wide decisions.
LowMinor inconsistency; does not affect outcomes but must still be corrected.

5. Document Supporting Evidence

  • Attach screenshots, scanned forms, or system logs showing the error.
  • Label each attachment by Discrepancy ID for traceability.

6. Report and Escalate

  • Submit documented discrepancies to the M&E Manager or Audit Lead.
  • Include them in the Audit Findings Report (SCLMR-5-AFR).
  • Feed into the Corrective Action Plan (SCLMR-5-CAP) for resolution.

๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Tools & Templates

  • SayPro Discrepancy Log Template (SCLMR-5-DDL)
  • Audit Findings Report (SCLMR-5-AFR)
  • Corrective Action Plan (SCLMR-5-CAP)
  • Discrepancy Evidence Folder (digital or physical archive)

Would you like a fillable template in Excel or Word format for logging discrepancies across SayPro projects? I can generate and structure one for direct use.

Comments

Leave a Reply