SayPro Judging Criteria Sheet for Theatre Performances.

Event: SayPro Monthly Theatre Performances
Event Date: January 2025
Organized by: SayPro Competitions Office
Purpose: To provide a standardized evaluation form for judges to fairly assess and rate theatrical performances based on essential criteria such as script quality, acting, directing, and stagecraft.

---

Overview

The SayPro Judging Criteria Sheet is designed to provide judges with a clear and structured way to evaluate the submitted theatre performances during the SayPro Monthly Theatre Performances. It ensures a consistent approach across all performances, enabling judges to provide fair and constructive feedback on key areas that define a successful production. The sheet is divided into several sections, each focusing on an important element of theatre, such as the script, acting, directing, and stagecraft. Judges will use this sheet to score each performance on a scale, allowing for a comprehensive review of the production as a whole.

The completed Judging Criteria Sheets will be submitted to the SayPro Competitions Office for further analysis, compilation, and feedback distribution to performers.

---

Key Sections of the Judging Criteria Sheet

1. Script Quality (25%)

This section evaluates the quality, originality, and impact of the script. A good script should have strong dialogue, a compelling narrative, and a cohesive structure.

• Clarity and Coherence of the Plot:
  • Does the script have a clear beginning, middle, and end?
  • Are the plot points logically structured, and do they engage the audience?
  • Is there a strong narrative drive that keeps the audience invested in the story?
• Character Development:
  • Are the characters well-developed with distinct voices and clear motivations?
  • Is there sufficient character depth, allowing the audience to connect emotionally?
• Originality and Creativity:
  • Does the script offer fresh, original ideas, or is it derivative of other works?
  • How innovative is the writing in terms of themes, structure, and presentation?
• Impact and Emotional Resonance:
  • Does the script evoke emotions or provoke thought in the audience?
  • Does it tackle relevant themes or issues in an engaging and thoughtful way?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)

2. Acting (25%)

This section focuses on the performance quality of the actors and how effectively they bring their characters to life.

• Character Interpretation:
  • Do the actors understand their characters and portray them convincingly?
  • Are the performances nuanced and multi-dimensional?
• Emotional Range and Expression:
  • Do the actors convey a wide range of emotions appropriately?
  • Are their performances believable and emotionally engaging?
• Physicality and Presence:
  • Do the actors use their body language and physical movements effectively to enhance their characters?
  • How strong is the actor’s stage presence?
• Chemistry Between Cast Members:
  • How well do the actors interact with one another?
  • Does the ensemble cast work cohesively, and do their relationships feel natural?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)

3. Directing (20%)

This section assesses the director’s role in guiding the production. It focuses on how well the director has managed the overall vision, pacing, and the integration of all elements of the production.

• Vision and Concept:
  • Does the director have a clear artistic vision for the production?
  • How effectively has this vision been executed throughout the performance?
• Pacing and Timing:
  • Is the pacing of the performance appropriate, and does it maintain audience engagement?
  • Are scenes timed well, and does the flow of the performance feel natural?
• Blocking and Staging:
  • Does the director make effective use of the stage space?
  • Is the movement of the actors on stage logical and purposeful?
• Management of Actors:
  • How well does the director guide the performances of the cast members?
  • Does the director ensure that the acting is consistent and aligned with the overall vision?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)

4. Stagecraft (20%)

This section evaluates the technical and visual aspects of the performance, including set design, lighting, sound, and costume design.

• Set Design and Construction:
  • Is the set design appropriate for the script and theme of the performance?
  • Are the set elements practical and visually appealing, enhancing the audience’s experience?
• Lighting and Sound:
  • Is the lighting used effectively to create mood, highlight key moments, and establish time/place?
  • How well does the sound design complement the performance (including music, sound effects, and acoustics)?
• Costume and Makeup Design:
  • Do the costumes reflect the character and the time period?
  • Are the costume and makeup choices appropriate and effective for each character?
• Technical Execution:
  • Are all technical elements (lighting, sound, special effects) executed without issue?
  • Are there any noticeable technical problems that hinder the performance?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)

5. Overall Production Quality (10%)

This section provides a final rating based on the judge’s overall impression of the production. This includes an assessment of how all elements (script, acting, directing, and stagecraft) work together to create a unified and impactful performance.

• Integration of Elements:
  • How well do the acting, directing, script, and technical aspects of the production come together?
  • Does the overall production feel cohesive and well-organized?
• Audience Impact:
  • Does the performance leave a lasting impression on the audience?
  • Does the production achieve its intended emotional or intellectual impact?

Rating Scale:
1-5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)

---

Scoring and Evaluation Summary

Each section of the Judging Criteria Sheet will be rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being “Poor” and 5 being “Excellent.” The total score will be calculated by summing the points from each section. The weight of each section is indicated above, with the final score being a reflection of the total contributions of all elements in the production.

• Script Quality (25%): [Score]
• Acting (25%): [Score]
• Directing (20%): [Score]
• Stagecraft (20%): [Score]
• Overall Production Quality (10%): [Score]
• Total Score: [Total out of 25]

Final Comments Section

At the end of the sheet, judges will be asked to provide additional feedback that may include suggestions for improvement, notes on what worked well, and any other observations.

Example Comments:

• “The acting in this production was strong, particularly the lead character’s emotional depth.”
• “The set design could be improved by making it more immersive.”
• “The director’s choice to focus on pacing added a lot to the intensity of the piece.”

---

Conclusion

The SayPro Judging Criteria Sheet is designed to ensure that each theatre production is evaluated fairly and thoroughly across key areas. This structured approach allows judges to provide valuable feedback to participants while ensuring a consistent and comprehensive review process. After the competition, the SayPro Competitions Office will compile these evaluations and share detailed feedback with the participants to help them refine their skills and grow as artists.