SayPro requires all entrants to demonstrate experience or interest in monitoring and evaluation, learning frameworks, or organizational behaviour.

Certainly. Here’s a detailed expansion of that line for your event invitation:

---

SayPro requires all entrants to demonstrate a clear experience or genuine interest in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E), Learning Frameworks, or Organizational Behaviour to ensure meaningful engagement and contribution to the SayPro Monthly February SCLMR-3 SayPro Monthly Monitor.

SayPro defines experience or interest in the following ways:

• SayPro accepts professional experience, such as working within a Monitoring and Evaluation department, participating in MEL-related projects, or involvement in the development or implementation of learning and development programs in organizations.
• SayPro also considers academic experience, including studies in fields such as development studies, education, public policy, psychology, sociology, business management, or related disciplines where M&E and learning principles are applied.
• SayPro welcomes emerging professionals, students, or researchers who may not have formal work experience but can demonstrate strong interest through volunteer work, project participation, published research, or personal learning initiatives related to evaluation and learning processes.
• SayPro encourages submission of evidence such as CVs, certificates, brief personal statements, recommendation letters, or project summaries to validate experience or interest.
• SayPro values diversity in entry and encourages participants from the public, private, non-profit, academic, and grassroots sectors to apply, provided they can articulate how their background connects to the key themes of the event: monitoring, evaluation, learning, and organizational behaviour.
• SayPro prioritizes entries that show a commitment to applying learning insights to cultural and behavioural change within communities, teams, or institutions.

---

Would you like me to include an evaluation rubric or selection criteria summary for internal review?