SayPro Workshop Feedback

Workshop Feedback for March SayPro SARS eFiling Training Workshop by SCFR

1. Overall Experience:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The workshop was overall a valuable experience. I felt that the session was well-structured and provided the information I was hoping to gain about SARS eFiling. The content covered all the important aspects, and I left with a clearer understanding of how to navigate eFiling effectively. However, I felt that some parts of the training could have been more interactive to keep the audience more engaged. There were moments where I felt the pace could have been adjusted to allow for more discussion or questions.

2. Content and Topics Covered:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The content was comprehensive and directly relevant to our needs. Topics such as eFiling basics, filing returns, using SARS eFiling tools, and common challenges were covered in detail. However, I would have appreciated more information on advanced topics like troubleshooting common eFiling errors or integrating eFiling with other accounting software. It would also have been helpful if the session included a deeper dive into the latest updates or changes to SARS eFiling procedures that may impact tax practitioners.

3. Trainer/Facilitator:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The trainer was very knowledgeable and seemed to have extensive experience with eFiling. They explained the topics clearly and provided useful examples. They were patient when answering questions, but sometimes the explanations were too fast, especially during more complex parts of the presentation. It would have been great if they slowed down a bit during these sections or provided more time for questions. The trainer was approachable and willing to answer queries, which was much appreciated.

4. Workshop Materials:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The materials provided (slides, handouts, etc.) were very helpful in reinforcing the key points discussed during the workshop. The slides were clear, and the examples included were relevant. However, I felt that the handouts could have been more detailed, particularly when it came to step-by-step guides for common eFiling tasks. Additionally, it would have been beneficial if the handouts were available before the workshop so we could follow along more effectively during the session.

5. Duration and Pace:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The session was a good length, but the pacing could have been more balanced. At times, the workshop felt rushed, especially during more complex topics such as filing returns and resolving errors. I think the pace could be slowed down a little to give participants more time to absorb the information. Perhaps having shorter breaks in between could help participants stay focused and engaged.

6. Practical Application:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  I feel more confident about using SARS eFiling after this session. The practical demonstrations helped a lot in showing how to apply the knowledge to real-world situations. However, I would have liked to see more interactive exercises where participants could practice filing returns or troubleshooting common issues in a guided setting. More hands-on activities could have made the learning experience more engaging and beneficial.

7. Interactivity and Engagement:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The workshop could benefit from more interactive elements. While there were some opportunities for Q&A, I feel that there could have been more audience participation. For example, live polls, quizzes, or breakout discussions on eFiling challenges would have made the session more engaging. More time should also be allocated for participants to ask specific questions about their personal challenges with eFiling.

8. Logistics and Organization:

• Rating (out of 5): [Insert rating]
• Detailed Feedback:
  The logistics were well-managed, and the workshop ran smoothly. The virtual platform used for the session was easy to navigate, and all links and resources were accessible. The start time was punctual, and the organizers communicated clearly about the session’s schedule. However, I would suggest ensuring that all participants are aware of the technical requirements in advance (such as software needed or recommended browsers), as this could prevent delays or technical issues.

9. Areas for Improvement:

• Comments:
  One area for improvement would be to incorporate more advanced tips and troubleshooting for common issues faced while eFiling. Many participants seemed eager to know about potential pitfalls and how to avoid them. Additionally, having more time for practical, hands-on experience with the platform would greatly benefit attendees. I also suggest offering an opportunity for a follow-up session or Q&A where we can clarify doubts after having had some time to apply the knowledge in practice.

10. Additional Comments/Suggestions:

• Comments:
  It would be great to receive a recording of the session or a follow-up email summarizing key points, especially for reference when applying the knowledge in the future. More specific examples from real-world case studies could also be helpful in demonstrating how eFiling works for different business types. Overall, I think this workshop was incredibly useful, and I would be interested in attending future sessions on more specialized topics.